Who Owns That Account? We Checked Our Own Estate First

Oct 25, 2026

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Identity & Access Governance: Closing Unmonitored Digital Doors Across Corporate Systems

Identity Security • Access Governance • Managed Cyber Security

Strategic Summary: When Si Futures deployed its identity governance tooling internally to test tenant security, an immediate audit exposed 29 un-accessed accounts, eight unowned shared mailboxes, and 41 ownerless directory contacts. By replacing manual admin portal checks with a consolidated ownership console, Si Futures established strict accountability rules and sponsor justification for all guest and service accounts.

Challenge: Why Things Get Missed Even With Good Processes

We recently turned our identity tooling on our own business before offering it to anyone else. Because we manage identity frameworks for clients, we wanted to audit our own estate first to identify gaps and prove real-world operational value.

The initial discovery was eye-opening:

  • 29 Unused Accounts: Active credentials and objects that had not been signed into for over a year.
  • 8 Redundant Shared Mailboxes: Legacy mailboxes lingering without active business owners.
  • 41 Ownerless Contacts: Directory items with zero assigned administrative responsibility.

Despite having formal processes in place, items still slipped through due to sheer volume. Manually navigating multiple administrative portals to check access logs across separate systems naturally leads to oversight. An unused account remains an unmonitored door—and an unmonitored door is precisely what attracts malicious actors.

Account Ownership, Not Mass Deletion

The objective of identity governance is not aggressive, blanket account deletion. The true goal is establishing clear ownership. Every credential, guest profile, service account, or app registration must have an assigned owner who justifies its continued existence.

Approach: Defining Ownership Across Disparate Systems

Designing a unified governance model required defining consistent account responsibility across varied platforms:

  • Universal Ownership Mapping: Every object type—users, service accounts, application registrations, guests, contacts, and mailboxes—is explicitly assigned an owner.
  • Sponsor Accountability for Guests: External guest accounts require an internal sponsor who introduced them to collaborate or share documentation.
  • Justification-Based Retention: Dormant accounts are not deleted outright if a documented business reason exists (e.g., backup developer access during leave periods).

Operational Outcomes & Identity Best Practices

Key operational improvements delivered through consolidated identity governance:

  • Single-Pane Visibility: Real-time console reporting highlighting unowned assets and dormant guest accounts across all systems.
  • Eliminated Attack Surface: Unused shared mailboxes and orphaned contacts systematically reviewed and remediated.
  • Practical Scaling: Replaced tedious manual portal sign-in checks with automated last-logon telemetry.

Governance Strategy: Starting With One Key Question

Whether managing 30 guests or hundreds of external collaborators, maintaining identity hygiene requires asking one fundamental question for every account: **Who owns this?** If no one in the organisation can answer, you have identified your primary security priority.

Discuss your account ownership and access governance requirements with our team, or explore how our managed cyber security solutions prevent unused accounts from becoming exposed doors.

Are Dormant Accounts Exposing Your Estate?

Discover where the identity gaps sit in your organisation with a comprehensive access governance audit from Si Futures.

AUDIT YOUR IDENTITY ESTATE

author avatar
Geordie Hogarth

Let’s connect